郑板桥

Dileep Acquitted in 2017 Actor Assault Case As Court Convicts Six Others_我的网站

A |     　　联合国安理会21日对角逐下任联合国秘书长职务的候选人进行第二轮意向性投票。与首轮投票相比，本轮候选人增至8人。

B |     In a verdict that brings to a close one of the most closely followed criminal trials in Kerala’s recent history, the Principal District and Sessions Court in Ernakulam on Monday acquitted Malayalam actor Dileep in the 2017 case concerning the abduction and sexual assault of a prominent woman actor. The court, presided over by Judge Honey M Varghese, found that the prosecution had failed to substantiate the allegations against Dileep, who was listed as the eighth accused, and against Charlie Thomas, the seventh accused.However, the court convicted six others, including the prime accused Sunil N S, better known as Pulsar Suni, finding them guilty of multiple serious charges including conspiracy, kidnapping, and gang rape. Sentences for the convicted individuals will be pronounced on December 12.     In This Article      Court Finds Key Accused Guilty of Multiple ChargesA Case That Shook Kerala’s Film IndustryDileep’s Arrest, Trial, and AcquittalWhat Lies AheadCourt Finds Key Accused Guilty of Multiple Charges     The six men convicted in the case are Sunil N S alias Pulsar Suni, Martin Antony, Manikandan B, Vijeesh V P, Salim H alias Vadival Salim, and Pradeep. They were found guilty under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 120B (criminal conspiracy), 340 (wrongful confinement), 354 (use of criminal force to outrage modesty), 366 (kidnapping), 354B (use of force to disrobe a woman), and 376D (gang rape).The court also found them guilty under relevant sections of the Information Technology Act for filming the sexual assault, an act that added a layer of digital evidence to a case already fraught with emotional and social repercussions.The Sessions Court noted that the evidence presented clearly established the involvement of the first six accused in the crime, while the same could not be said for Dileep and Charlie Thomas. The judge stated that the prosecution was unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Dileep had played any role in planning or abetting the crime.          A Case That Shook Kerala’s Film Industry     The incident dates back to February 17, 2017, when the survivor, a well-known Malayalam actor, was abducted while travelling to a film shoot in Thrissur. She was allegedly confined inside a moving vehicle and subjected to sexual assault, with the ordeal recorded by the perpetrators on camera.The case sent shockwaves through Kerala and the wider film industry, not only for the nature of the crime but also for the stature of the accused and the victim. The survivor’s courage in pursuing justice inspired widespread conversations about safety, gender dynamics, and accountability in the entertainment world.The first major breakthrough came the day after the incident, when the police arrested Martin Antony, the driver of the vehicle. Within a week, the alleged mastermind Pulsar Suni was also taken into custody. By the end of that month, four more individuals had been arrested, marking a swift initial phase of the investigation.Suni, the first accused, remained in custody for over seven years before being granted bail by the Supreme Court in 2024. Throughout this period, he consistently maintained that he had acted on someone else’s instructions, though his claims remained mired in contradictions and speculation.          Dileep’s Arrest, Trial, and Acquittal     Dileep’s arrest in July 2017 marked a dramatic turning point in the case. The actor was accused of conspiring to orchestrate the crime as an act of revenge following personal disputes involving his then-wife. His arrest divided public opinion in Kerala, leading to polarised debates and protests across the state.The actor’s first two bail pleas were rejected by the Kerala High Court, citing the gravity of the charges and the need for a thorough investigation. He was eventually granted bail in October 2017 after spending 83 days in judicial custody.The trial officially commenced in 2020 and continued for nearly five years. During the proceedings, more than 200 witnesses were examined, and hundreds of documents were submitted as evidence. Despite the extensive nature of the trial, the court ultimately ruled that the prosecution’s case against Dileep lacked sufficient evidence for conviction.For Dileep, who remains one of Malayalam cinema’s biggest stars, the verdict marks the end of a prolonged legal and public ordeal. The actor had consistently maintained his innocence, claiming he had been falsely implicated.     What Lies Ahead     While the judgment has acquitted Dileep, it does not necessarily bring the legal proceedings to a full stop. The survivor retains the right to appeal the verdict before the Kerala High Court, which could reopen judicial scrutiny into the alleged conspiracy.The case remains a defining chapter in Kerala’s cultural and judicial narrative, one that tested the state’s legal system and its society’s response to crimes against women. As the dust settles, the conversation around justice, gender, and accountability in Malayalam cinema is far from over.Also Read: Dileep’s ‘Prince And Family’ Cleared For Release With A U Certificate。　　当天，投票在安理会磋商室闭门进行。投票过程中，所有安理会成员使用相同颜色的选票，选票上每位候选人的名字后有“鼓励”“劝阻”和“不发表意见”三个选项。投票结束后，拉脱维亚和俄罗斯负责计票。

C | 　　安理会本月轮值主席、丹麦常驻联合国代表拉森对媒体表示，第二轮意向性投票结果不对外公布，投票结果将由各候选人的推举国向本人通报。　　按照惯例，联合国秘书长遴选过程将进行多轮意向性投票。

D | 虽然前期意向性投票结果不对外公布，但相关投票情况历来备受关注。候选人在得知投票结果后，可据此评估自身支持情况，并决定是否继续参选。外界则可借此研判遴选进程的发展方向。　　本月17日，汤加推举一位来自厄瓜多尔的外交官参选下任联合国秘书长。目前，角逐这一职务的候选人共8位，他们分别是：厄瓜多尔外交官伊沃内·巴基、智利前总统米歇尔·巴切莱特、来自厄瓜多尔的联大前主席玛丽亚·费尔南达·埃斯皮诺萨、来自阿根廷的现任国际原子能机构总干事拉斐尔·格罗西、来自哥斯达黎加的现任联合国贸易和发展会议秘书长蕾韦卡·格林斯潘、来自乌干达的联合国前副秘书长奥拉拉·奥通努、圭亚那现任常驻联合国代表卡罗琳·罗德里格斯-伯基特、塞内加尔前总统麦基·萨勒。　　根据《联合国宪章》，联合国秘书长的产生首先必须由安理会推荐，然后由联合国大会任命。　　现任联合国秘书长古特雷斯的任期将于今年12月31日届满。下任联合国秘书长遴选于去年11月启动，整个过程预计将持续至今年9月或10月，直至安理会就最终人选形成一致意见。（记者     王帆）。

Current article:http://su1f.shangyaohujunwei.bond/news/20260826_475418.html

Published on:02:40:59